Nature’s drama played out on earth from the Paleolithic
Stage Africa to about 13,000BC when Ice quit advancing to about 8000BC when
significant melting has occurred, the world was being booming with life within
the Sub-Tropical, Tropical and Equatorial climatic regions. The warm climatic
regions were occupied by the most advanced people of the then world ~ the Igbo
later referred to as “The Bantus”.
At whatever Age from the Paleolithic Africa’s Stage to Africa's Inheritance Age, West Africans were sailing to and from the Americas. This was the Fact of History and is the fact of History and will be the fact of History.
The Evidences are overwhelming. For sure the “The international Conspirators to deny Africans their history, are as surprised as the Africans are, including the writer by the “Enigma” ~the “True History of Africa”. No one ever expected such a history to ever be written especially those who conspired to ensure it never would be written. It presents the following statements:
IF one looked for the link between the behaviors and characteristics of the Egyptian people from the Periods of the Anglo-Egyptians to the present; and compared them with the behaviors and characteristics of (the presumed behavior) of the Ancient Egyptian Pyramid Builders he/she is apt to make an unpardonable and grievous error in interpretations and judgment of history..
Note that :
[1] The pyramid builder did not vanish or disappear from the Earth.
[2] That the fact of History- that a Civilization’s Era often times end with a period that alienated
it and the people of it’s times from their descendants.
The examples:~ The Ancient Igbo [Bantustans] Nuk Civilizations and the Modern Bantustans, including the Ancient Uju Umpatta and the modern Egypt; The Ancient Summaras and Erudu and the modern Babylonians; the Ancient Mayans and Aztecs and the modern Native Central Americans, the Ancient Canaries and the descendants that have now been wiped out by the Spaniards, the story is the same
It is true that the Pyramid Builders did not vanish and disappear from the earth, the Current Surviving Natives are the Descendants of the Pyramid Builders.
The Ancestors of the Olmec the Original Native Americans and the Olmecs the Ancestors of the Mayans did never vanish and disappeared from the Earth. The ending of most ancient civilizations has always been a period of alienation between the past and the future. The modern Egyptians and even the centuries of Egyptology have not the Human knowledge, the will nor the simplicity of Spiritual Wisdom of their past Ancestors. Above all they are only but a tinny piece of the Mighty One World of the Ancient Igbo.
IF one looked for the Link and compares, the exploits of the West Africans from the Periods of the European-West African to the present; with the behavior of the West African Origin of the Egyptian Pyramid Builders, the Central American Pyramid builders, the Pyramids of Alagwurike (Greece), the Megaliths of Ala Enge (British Isle), the Ancient Rock Artists of Panya (Spain and France) and the Mediterranean European and African Countries, he/she is apt to make an unpardonable AND grievous error in interpretations and judgment of history. This is because , the current Native West African Igbo [Bantustans] are the Descendants.
The “Truth” has an indefatigable patience, and always will defy conspiracies and Cover-ups, only to question man’s capacity to pursue Error.
In all cases, such error has a formation-background cushioned on the conformity to preserve the efforts to deny the “True History” [The true historic events that actually happened] and thereby replacing “True History with False History”.
The UNESCO General History vented it out simply as “In fact, there was a refusal to see Africans as the creators of original cultures which flowered and survived over the centuries in patterns of their own making and which historians are unable to grasp unless they
forgo their prejudices and rethink their approach” .
This is a portion; the doctor prescription, for the History’s disorder~ the “ Afro-Phobia” that pestered and infected many European Historians causing then to yell Afrocentrism whenever the “True History of Man” is written.
The unearthing of the many Stone Heads in the Americas was the most fundamental element of the work of the archaeologist(s) who excavated the earth and have brought out the revelation that links the Americas to West Africa. The detailed scrutiny of these stone-heads of the Americas, sums the exhibited Lineament, revealing the gross physical attributes which have led claim to being the representation of the original ancestors of the Americas North and South. Once these artifacts have been published, the Archaeologists summation is made subject to the World’s Common Knowledge regarding the Ancient Society that they represent. Many Archaeologists in the past have looked at their finds as objects to be manipulated, to re-frame the observable, even to deny the obvious truths; which were the vital characteristics of the Ancient Society that created the artifacts. Many Archaeologists have interpreted their finds with great efforts to fit them, or credit them to “ whomever, or wherever their ego directs them” . The ultimate goal was to manipulate the revelation of the society that created such objects in spite of the artifacts; which tend to tell differing stories.
[1.2]The Central Americas Olmec Stone Heads
The culture that the Omlec(Olmec) society brought to the Americas was inherited and it grew and was handed down to their descendants. That Culture and Civilization were never lost. The roots of the Mayans and the Aztecs Civilizations trails back to the Olmec and thereon to West Africa.
Igbo(Bantu) Bronze, a pre-European art depicting an Igbo(Bantu) Soldier. Take a good look at the stand. Both the stand and the figure were made One-piece. The Africans that made such as this, were the same Africans that also created and are depicted in the Stone-Heads of Central America. Central America was the Obiala Umualaeke ~the Centerland of Umualaeke(Olmec/Omlec) Civilization

In the past many Anthropologists and historians have written to establish the West African Origin of the Native Americans. The 'fusion' of African and native Pre-Colombian Americans though this fact has been treated as hypothesis. Evidence has been put forward ranging from linguistics, plant geography, skeletons, terracotta figures and even North African 'Tifinagh' inscriptions on the Virgin Islands.” The trail from Africa through the Atlantic Ocean to Central America at an Age about 80,000 BC and the world of implications it carries, has brought out to the open the forces that “wish that it be untrue”. The more arguments they present the clearer and more refined the evidences become in support of the West African direct origin of the Native Americans. From the Pacific Ocean and the Pacific Islands more Pillars of Stone unite with the Omlec/Olmec Heads and resolutely make their case for the truth ~ Stone Heads Fusion of the Africans and the Native Americans.

The culture that the Omlek (Omlec) society brought to the Americas was inherited and it grew. It was reinforced regularly by more settlements that continued to arrive from West African. Their culture as inherited was handed down to their descendants. That culture and civilization was never lost. The roots of the Mayan and the Aztec civilizations trail back to the Olmeks and thereon to West Africa. West Africans were there in the Americas before the arrival of Columbus in 1492.
The extracts from the Pre-existing writings: In the past, many anthropologists and historians have written to establish the West African origin of the Native Americans, thus:
“The 'fusion' of African and native Pre-Columbus Americans, has been a fact, that is en treated as hypothesis. Evidence has been put forward ranging from linguistics, plant geography, skeletons, terracotta figures and even North African 'Tifinag' inscriptions on the Virgin Islands.”Easter Island History; Rapa Nui History: The Moai Quarry on Easter Island | Chris
Easter Island Rapa Nui Isla de Pascua
The 'Tifinagh', Insibidi:
The so called Tifang was the inscription on the Isibidi of the Caribbean People derived from the Ederede of Umanuforo the Igbo of Ouwerre [Ouwarre is made up of Europe, Africa, Asia Minor and India].
In continuation: The strongest evidence for the West African origin of the people represented in the Olmec/Omlec colossal stone heads are found at La-Venta and San Lorezo.
Here, the Stone Heads make the strongest arguments by themselves, for their origin. These are the exhibited and displayed Negroid West African features. They have spark- off Afro Phobia, a disorder within the so called Modern Meso-American Scholars; yielding in its wake gross academic feats at manipulation of “Who, the Olmec/Omlec Stone Heads represent?.
*The questions, why is the origin of the people who carved the Stone Heads a problem?.
* How long have they or their ancestors have lived in the land before the Stone Heads were carved.
*What was the Language, of the descendants of such Ancestors and their descendants including the Olmec/Omlec and finally; * How and when did those Ancestors arrive on the land.
These stone heads by themselves pose not any doubts as to their origin.
Whoever in the world, then and today that has such features as are exhibited by the stone heads must be a Negroid, an Igbo(Bantus) by origin. So it does not matter if you assign their origin to Great Britain or to Japan, you are only saying, that the people of Great Britain or Japan are Negroid and therefore are Bantus.
By the Handed Down History, The Igbo(Bantus) have been in the land of Umu Alaeke (Central and South America), Arika Chinyere(The Ala Ugwuukwu Arikara~ Land of the Rocky Mountains and Ogundom (Land of the Appalachian Mountains) for more than 80,000 years before the carving of the Stone Heads.
The Negroid Bantus were coming and going from West Africa through out the period. It was this knowledge when acquired from West Africans by Columbus that enabled him to venture into the Atlantic Ocean. When he got there, he did meet with human beings. Europeans then did not care or wanted to know but rather they chose to cover up, the origin of such human that greeted Columbus on arrival in the Americas. They made Columbus a hero for rediscovering the already discovered and occupied lands. They usurped the African Heritage and History.
The huge proportions of the heads demonstrate that they were influential people, and their association with the Olmec culture at around (1,200-600 B.C.) places them long before the Maya, Inca or Columbus's arrival in America.” " (Jordan 1992).
*Van Sertima concluded that these people originated from *Egypt and the middle-east. The first rumors of where they came from was in 1850, In 1858 the knowledge of the existence of large stone-heads in Tres Zapotes was revealed. The archaeologist Dr. Stirling was the fortunate one that that uncovered the first Stone Head. It was carved on block of basalt rock.
Quoting Dr Stirling a British man: The Stone Heads were “unique among aboriginal American sculptures, it is remarkable for its realistic treatment. ‘The features are bold and are amazingly negroid in character' *
*Note: Ivan Van Sertima’s conclusion that these people were from Egypt and the Middle East, did not make sense. It would only if Egyptians and the people of Asia Minor(Middle East) were amazingly negroid.
The increased number of digging in South America yielded many more larger heads than were earlier found at sites such as La Venta. The many Stone Heads began to reveal a the True Origin of Native American and true history for the World in what is now known as “The pre-Columbian History of the Americas”. This is History that was almost lost to World. It has been observed that the La Venta stone heads showed many similarities to those found at Tres Zapotes . Van Sertima and many others agree that these heads were 'revered'.
There dominant positions situated in the ancient ceremonial plaza made the necessary statement of fact. Four heads were found at La Venta, all of them faced the Atlantic, the observations at La Venta continued with emphasis on the religious nature of the individual Stone Head thus; “ the largest at 9ft high had its domed top flattened so that it could function as an altar; a speaking tube was found going in at the ear and out at the mouth; a possible oracle or talking god”.
The reader or the student should note that the Stone Heads La Venta faced the Atlantic Ocean from where the Ancestors arrived to the Americas and that was East, affirming the Religious belief in the Sun-god worship [Owuwara Anyanwu](East~ the Rising Sun).
La Venta was not alone in the acceptance of the depiction of Negroid faces in stone. Apart from the four found there, two were excavated in Tres Zapotes and a further ten at San Lorenzo in Vera Cruz, one of which, the largest known, is nine feet, four inches high, and is estimated to weigh over 40 tons The Conclusive fact forwarded by *Van Sertima reinforcing the truth that the 'Olmec' sites of La Venta and Tres Zapotes were governed by Negroid Africans. **(and Middle-eastern Caucasians between 800-600 BC),(Ivan Van Sertima)
Note: Ivan Van Sertima did not show the Stone-Head of the Caucasian mentioned above. He wrote it because he believed that “It has to be so” even when the Artifacts and the history they portray say otherwise. Even that much did not dissuade the Eurocentric Historians ostracizing him.
In 1972, the study by Andrzej Wiercinski showed that 76 fragmentary cranial pieces from Tlatilco, one of the site, reflecting the Olmec civilization, was "a clear prevalence of the total Negroid pattern" (Jordan 1992).
It was observed that Wiercinski measured the skulls for 48 morphological traits, but focused on the traits he considered best for discriminating between the "three great races of man" (Van Rossum 2004).
Please Note that the above quotations were selected for obvious reasons. I wanted us, you the reader and I to do the analysis together. It helps to detect false claims, and to clean them out; thus exposing “The Truths of History”.
[1] the Stone Heads speak for themselves as Self Interpreted Artifacts (SIA)
[2] Wiercinski’s report was conclusive; because they were carried out on fragments that were
Artifacts of Archaeological value.
[3] It does not now matter, what was the independent observation of such as Ivan Van Sertima,
The world has grown wiser and is capable of judging for itself, and do not need to read the
writings of the holders of Doctors of Philosophy in Scientific English Language to tell what is
true history and what is fiction.
There were others writers, such as Fred W. Nelson, Jr. who chose to speak for the Artifacts. He lees the world of reader to believe that the Giant Stone Heads being Negroid or not Negroid is a matter of words; such as Doliccephalic, Brchycephalic, leptoprosopic, euryprosopic, prognathism and orthogenetic.
Thus: He argues “As one studies the chart it becomes evident that there is not much similarity between the colossal stone heads and Negroes. In fact, in many instances the heads are exactly opposite from the Negroid type. For example: Negroes are dolichocephalic, while the heads are brachycephalic; Negroes are leptoprosopic, but the heads euryprosopic; Negroes show prognathism, while the heads are orthognathic (jaws do not project); etc. In fact, the only significant characteristic that seems to be shared by both is the lip form, but on close examination it appears that the lips of the stone heads are not the thick, puffy, everted lips of Negroes. Therefore, I am of the opinion that the colossal heads are not representations of Negroes but of some other physical type”.
What other physical types? Whatever other physical type, is still Negroid
* This is the typical European attitude towards anything that glorifies the Africans. To the Africans and the rest of the World, this is how “The Colossal Negro Stone Heads of the Americas in spite of their gross physical lineament and other evidences that relate them to West Africans as portrayed by the natives peoples and their Languages (obviously West African) are coveted by sentimentalist European writers to wish them to become “European or White”.
Interesting: “but the heads euryprosopic;”.
Is what you the reader sees in the Stone Heads, the same as what you read below; within the pens of Racism.
Quote: “To assess whether the associations with cranial and facial indices differed between whites and African-Americans with OSA, analyses were restricted to participants with an AHI ⩾ 15 (Table 3). Among these subjects with an AHI ⩾ 15, both cranial and facial indices showed a significant difference between whites and African-Americans. The mean CI among whites with moderate-severe OSA was greater than the mean CI of African-Americans with OSA (82.3 ± 4.5 [SD] mm versus 79.9 ± 4.5 mm, p = 0.007). In contrast, African-Americans with OSA had a higher mean FI than that of the white OSA group (89.1 ± 9.0 mm versus 84.5 ± 6.1 mm, p = 0.004). In other words, whites with OSA had a greater tendency toward brachycephaly, a head form associated with reduced anterior-posterior cranial dimensions, than African-Americans with OSA.(BANU CAKIRER, MARK G. HANS, GREG GRAHAM, JOAN AYLOR, PETER V. TISHLER and SUSAN REDLINE):
Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Susan Redline, M.D., Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, 11100 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44106-6003.
E-mail: sxr15@po.cwru.edu.
All the Academics and Professional Degrees boils down to such as Cl, Fl of OAS to keep the Divisive Diabolical Spirit Alive.
The reader must note the following data: Look at the play on the + and - Effect on the data:~ We lie with statistics as we do with genetics and laboratory science.
The mean CI among whites with moderate-severe OSA was greater than the mean CI of African-Americans with OSA (82.3 ± 4.5 [SD] mm versus 79.9 ± 4.5 mm, p = 0.007).
African American 82.3+4.5 =86.8 vs. 79.9 + 4.5 = 84.4 white American
82.3-4.5 = 77.8 vs. 79.9 - 4.5 = 75.45
The Data says that both whites and blacks fall within the Cl Range
*86.8 and 84,4 Or 77.8 and 75.45
and that you can find whites and blacks anywhere within the range *86.8 and 75.45
In contrast, African-Americans with OSA had a higher mean FI than that of the white OSA group (89.1 ± 9.0 mm versus 84.5 ± 6.1 mm, p = 0.004).
89.1+9.0= 98.1 vs. 84.5 +6.1 = 90.6
White American 89.1 -9.0 = 80.1 vs. 84.5 -6.1 = 78..4
The Data says that both whites and blacks fall within the FI Range 89.1 and 78.4
The White America F1 has an OSA has in fact fallen within the so call range typical of OSA of the African American.
More by Fred W. Nelson Jr. thus “There is still other evidence which leads me to believe that there never was an important Negro influence in ancient Mesoamerica.
Here we witness like lying with Statistics, how in Racism we lie with Biology and Genetics:
In human blood-group studies of the past few years it has been discovered that there are certain antigens that are peculiar to Negroes from Africa. Some of these are the Su antigen, the He antigen, the Js antigen, and the V antigen. These are found only in the blood of Africans or people of African descent.
As we often can lie with Statistics, the White writer, always must have some Genetic claim that will dismiss and make some obvious truth vanish and disappear . The only problem is that he did not test his own blood and did not test mine.
The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) supports the West African Origin of the Natives of the Americas in the General History for Africa:
Quote:~ “Although the phenomenon may vary in different places, it is now quite clear that ways of feeling, thinking, dreaming and acting in (certain) nations of the *western hemisphere have been marked by their African heritage. The cultural inheritance of Africa is visible everywhere, from the southern United States to northern Brazil, across the Caribbean and on the Pacific seaboard. In certain places it even underpins the cultural identity of some of the most important elements of the population” . …. (UNESCO) General History For Africa.
*Since the Western Hemisphere includes the Americas and Europe, therefore, for clarity, we re-state the statement thus:
**“Although the phenomenon may vary in different places, it is now quite clear that ways of feeling, thinking, dreaming and acting in the nations of the *western hemisphere including the European nations have been marked by their African heritage. The cultural inheritance of Africa is visible everywhere, especially from the southern United States to northern Brazil, across the Caribbean and throughout Atlantic and the Pacific seaboard. In certain places it even underpins the cultural identity of some of the most important elements of the population”.
. It is necessary to clarify and to remove the ambiguity in the original statement. Call a Spade a Spade and begin the discussions and let the arguments flow. Talk about the truth and it will polish and shine itself. It is the World History from out of Africa.
The above calls on such writer as Gabriel Haslip-Viera, Bernard Ortiz de Montellano and Warren Barbour to rethink their volumes on “Robbing Native American Cultures; Van Sertima’s Afrocentricity”. The United Nations is not an Afro-Centric Organization neither would the volumes on Oka [Maize] Botany change the faces of the Stone Heads of the Olmec Americans.
The world sympathize with such writer's efforts and observation, summed up in the conclusions that:
“For the most part, the Afrocentrists and other cultural nationalists have heartily endorsed Van Sertima’s thesis despite it’s obvious weakness in methodology and evidence. Although they have called for Afrocentric history that is accurate and well-intentioned/, they seem to be more concerned with the need to raise the “self-esteem” of the African American, regardless of the impact on others.” s (Gabriel Haslip-Viera, Bernard Ortiz de Montellano and Warren Barbour).
Note that this same views are held by many modern Mesoamerican Eurocentric Afro-Phobic writers.
The volumes of verbosity and charade boils down to “why did Van Sertima report the truth regarding the Olmec Stone Heads. As obvious as Stone Heads are, they expected Ivan Van Sertima to lie about their origin. For the reason, that they believed that the truth will raise the “Self-Esteem” of the African Americans; *****and would therefore denied the Eurocentric historians the basis to maintain the falsification of history.
This history as is handed down establishes that Gabriel Haslip-Viera, Bernard Ortiz de Montellano and Warren Barbour and many more like then were descendants of the Bantustans~ the very West Africans; who did not avoid Europe a Bantustan Home land before venturing to occupy the distant Americas.
Once again, the truth has an indefatigable patience and power to self preserve and will
bring to not today or tomorrow the egoistic sentimentalist fictional history.
In all the above discussions, the African has this questions to ask; and so will the reader and or student; “How did the Ancestors of the Omlec get to the Americas”?
Obviously the ‘Stone Heads of the Americas’ do not look like Siberians and or Mongolians and therefore, they did not enter the Americas via the Bearing Sea.
Note the interpretational arguments given regarding the Massive West African Stone Heads of the Umu-Alaekeh [Olmec] the Obvious Ancestors of the Native Americans.
“Translate as you look into the Faces of the Stone Heads; the following;
The Facts forwarded by Van Sertima reinforcing the truth that the 'Olmec' sites
of La Venta and Tres Zapotes were governed by Negroid Africans. **( and) Middle-eastern Caucasians between 800-600 BC,)”
(a) The underlined speaks for itself; saying that the unavoidable use of“ Negroid
Africans” [West Africans] was indeed impossible to avoid, they were too obvious.
(b) Nonetheless, it will stick to add- “...and Middle-eastern Caucasians between
800-600 BC”. An inconclusive date. The Olmecs/Omlecs were much older in the
Americas tens of thousand years before the Stone Heads were carved.
(c) Note that it all says; If you cannot make it Caucasian or North African cover it up,
it is not Favorable History.
Advise to students; Please read the General History for Africa Volume 1 by UNESCO and discover that there has been in existence what I have recognized as “The International Conspiracy to deny Africa her History”.
Note also that the people of Asia Minor have become Caucasians lately. This contradicts the theoretical origin of the Europeans. “The African who left Africa had passed through the Asia Minor en-route to becoming Europeans. Those-would-be Europeans have yet to reach Siberia and Mongolia before swooping down in detour passing through the Caucasus Mountain where they became Caucasians then into Europeans”. By the facts of the “theory of the Caucasians”, the people, of the age old Asia Minor [The Middle East] were never Caucasians. In general, the bogus and convoluted theory of the origin of Caucasians has always maintained the ambiguity that denies it‘s validity.
It only exists to attest to the European resort to denying their true origin for a fictitious one.
Their West Africans origin via the open Oshimiri Ouwarre the Atlantic Ocean; the home land range of the West African extending into Northern Ouwarre[now Europe], and the easy access even for a pole-vault into Spain from Gibraltar will remains the only true history for the Spread of the Africans into what is now Europe (see also the Ouwarrian Lineament for more; Vol. 6 of the African Odyssey~ The Outline of African History and the World).
[5] Ones again, the call to you, the reader is made, asking you to judge the following:
“In 1972, craniologist Andrzej Wiercinski reported that 13.5% of the 76 fragmentary crania from: Tlatilco, a site associated with the Olmec civilization, showed "a clear prevalence of the
total Negroid pattern" (Jordan 1992).
** Here the reader understands that Human Crania Evidence has ruled out all non-Negroid except if Egypt was Negroid. In continuation of the above Quote, “ Wiercinski measured the skulls for 48 morphological traits, but focused on the traits he considered best for discriminating between the "three great races of man" (Van Rossum 2004).” .
As stated before: “Many Archaeologists have interpreted their finds with great efforts to fit them, or credit them to “ whomever, or wherever their ego directs them” . The ultimate goal was to manipulate the revelation of the society that created such objects in spite of the artifacts; which tend to tell differing stories.
[1] What strikes the mature reader’s mind, is the use of the word “Negroid” to avoid using “West Africa or the Igbo (Bantus)”. This is in compliance to “The International Conspiracy to deny Africa her History”
[2] Note the Date 1200BC to 600BC speaks of the time of “Making of the Stone Heads” not necessarily the time of “Arrival and the Years of residence before the Age that carved the Heads”.
[3] The date may equally be totally and completely wrong as the Conspiracy must fit such date into European Chronology. The Stone Heads could have been Carved during the Paleolithic African Age 200,000 to 40,000. The dating of Artifacts are commonly done in compliance, to “The International Conspiracy to deny Africa her History”.
[4] The reader is challenged to seek answer to the question; “Where in Egypt and Asia Minor (Middle East) at the dated (historic-period), did exist, the likeness of Egyptian and Peoples of Asia Minor(Middle East), to the Facial Lineament of the Stone Head Faces?”. These people have undergone the process of Adaptation Genetics as portrayed in the Ouwarrian Lineament in the SubTropical Climate and Environment of the region. Though still typically Bantus,they have lost a degree of melanin or pigmentation of the Equatorial Bantu.
In accordance to “The International Minimalist Doctrine”, if the Historic Evidence is too obvious in favor of Africa, credit it all to Egypt.
Egypt has become Caucasian because the Civilization of Africa’s Ancient Ancestors will not be credited to Black Africans, the rightful origin. The West Africans built the Pyramids of the Central Americas, the Canaries Island and other Oshimiri Ouwarre Onimah(Atlantic Ocean Islands) the Megaliths of the World, just as they built the Pyramids of Egypt.
Note that the Egypt we know today was not the same as the Region Uju-Umpatta of the Bantustan Empire nor the Uju-Umpatta [Egypt] that enslaved the Jews. In truth the present Egypt is the shrunken, squished-up and caged up Lower Uju-Umpatta of the Imperialist Europe.
An Unfinished Stone
References:
1). Coe, Michael; Snow, Dean; Benson, Elizabeth; (1986) Atlas of Ancient America; Facts on File, New York.
2). http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread445497/pg1
3). Ivan Van Sertima. African presence in Early America. 1992. Transaction Publishers.
4). http://www.aztec-history.com/olmec-civilization.html
5). http://archaeology.about.com/od/saterms/qt/san_lorenzo.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment